Transcripts

Alcoa Corporation's management answers for the business every quarter. These are the exchanges that explain it best — verbatim, from the call transcripts preserved in Sources. Each link opens the full transcript at that page in a new tab.

Q2 2026 Earnings Call — Q2 2026

The largest deal in Alcoa's history explained line by line — synergies, the cash/stock split, the lockbox, ticking fee and CVR — alongside a record aluminum quarter and the one timeline that could slip. · Open the full transcript →

The case for buying South32's upstream assets, with synergies management insists are bottom-up, not consultant math.

William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): This acquisition is about creating long-term shareholder value. First, the strategic fit is compelling. We are bringing together highly complementary assets that are mostly in close geographic proximity to our existing portfolio. This creates opportunities to improve performance by leveraging our combined expertise and scale. Second, the acquisition unlocks significant value through synergies. We have identified approximately $900 million of net present value synergies, including roughly $50 million of run-rate cost savings starting in the first year following closing. These synergies are backed by numerous initiatives identified during due diligence by our subject matter experts. The estimates are not high-level consultant projections. They are each highly actionable and based on areas where Alcoa has a demonstrated track record of execution. Third, the acquisition delivers compelling financial results. These assets enhance our ability to generate stronger cash flow through the cycle and improve our position on the global alumina and aluminum cost curves. We expect the acquisition to be accretive to our earnings per share and cash flow metrics immediately after close, with additional upside as synergies are captured over time.

p. 2 · Read in context →

Why a commodity buyer pays partly in stock: the equity and the CVR are deliberate risk-sharing, not a financing constraint.

William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Let me provide some additional context on the transaction based on questions we have received from investors about our rationale for the mix of cash and equity consideration—$3.1 billion and $1 billion, respectively. In our view, the stock consideration as well as the contingent value right provides for risk sharing between the buyer and seller. Commodity prices can and will change, and we believe this structure adapts to that dynamic, mitigating Alcoa's exposure to those market-driven value changes. This results in a fair transaction that is appreciated by both sets of shareholders.

p. 2 · Read in context →

The three mechanics that decide what Alcoa actually pays: locked box, ticking fee, and a $750 million capped CVR.

William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Additionally, we want to clarify certain elements of the transaction structure, which includes three important components: the lockbox, the ticking fee, and the contingent value right or CVR. Starting with a locked box, this structure allows Alcoa to benefit from the cash flow generated by the acquired assets going back to 04/01/2026. As the assets generate cash, those amounts accrue to Alcoa and offset the cash consideration to be paid at closing. Based on publicly available information, we estimate the locked box to hold more than $200 million as of 06/30/2026. This value will fluctuate until closing; it gives a sense of the magnitude this mechanism could generate for Alcoa. Second, there is a ticking fee. Beginning after South32 shareholder approval, in October or November, we will pay a negotiated 5% annualized fee on the $3.1 billion cash consideration to compensate South32 for its cost of capital. We estimate approximately $80 million to $100 million in ticking fees to be paid at closing. Third, there is a CVR that aligns revenue sharing with market performance. If alumina or aluminum prices exceed agreed thresholds, South32 can participate in a portion of that upside, up to a maximum of $750 million over four years.

p. 2 · Read in context →

The buy-versus-build argument that underpins the deal: new refining and smelting capacity now costs more than the assets on offer.

William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): At our Investor Day last year, we outlined our long-term view that the world will need more alumina and more aluminum driven by electrification, grid investment, transportation, packaging, and broader industrial growth. That thesis has not changed. Over the next decade, we expect primary aluminum demand outside of China to grow by approximately 7 million metric tons while alumina demand is expected to increase by approximately 18 million metric tons. […] The challenge is that new supply will be difficult and expensive to bring online. While we expect additional capacity to be built through restarts and expansions, the capital required to develop new refining and smelting capacity today is substantially higher than historical costs, especially when you compare with past expansions in China. […] Rather than spending years developing new assets, we are acquiring high-quality, large-scale operations that are already producing and integrated into the value chain. Importantly, we are acquiring that capacity at a valuation that is well below replacement cost.

p. 3 · Read in context →

How a record 32.3% aluminum margin was built — cast-house flexibility converting prime metal into premium-bearing product.

Molly S. Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer): In the second quarter, the Aluminum segment delivered record segment adjusted EBITDA of $1.1 billion and an EBITDA margin of 32.3%. This reflects not only the benefit of higher metal prices, but also our ability to convert strong market conditions into bottom-line performance. Key contributors to this sequential performance were stable operations and disciplined cost management, effective production ramp-up, adding approximately 25 thousand metric tons of flexible casting capacity which converted approximately 30 thousand metric tons of prime metal into value-added product shipments with the added product premium, and overall strong shipping performance with 726 thousand metric tons delivered.

p. 4 · Read in context →

Asked why aluminum gave back its war premium, the CEO separates sentiment from fundamentals — and explains China running above its cap.

Timna Tanners (Analyst, Wells Fargo); William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Hey, good evening. I wanted to take a step back and ask a little bit about, I know you referred to the aluminum price retreat, of course, of late and attributed it to macro factors. But your last slide deck talked extensively about the disruptions in the Middle East, and you alluded to them again this time, but yet the aluminum price, as you point out, has gone to pre-Iran conflict levels. So what do you attribute that to? And along those same lines, some people are worried about China contributing to that retreat and overproducing. What do you think is happening in China? […] So I will address both of those, Timna. The first answer is sentiment. The fundamentals from when the Iran conflict started have not fundamentally changed. So we believe at this point there is between three and 3.5 million metric tons of capacity offline within the Strait of Hormuz, and that caused prices to run up. Subsequently, when conflict resolution signals emerged, that caused prices to run down. Fundamentals have not really changed at this point. That capacity is still offline and as the Strait stays closed for longer, it becomes more difficult for the existing capacity in the region to continue to operate. So we believe it is sentiment driven. Within China, we are now projecting that China will run around 45 million metric tons of production during the course of the year. Yes, that is higher than the 45 million metric ton cap. We do not believe that is a signal of a change in philosophy within China. They have not opened up new capacity. This is just creeping utilization of the assets that they have given the higher metal price.

p. 8 · Read in context →

The Western Australia mining approvals: confidence in the outcome unchanged, but the year-end timeline is conceded as at risk.

Glyn Lawcock (Analyst, Barrenjoey); William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Obviously, you spent the month of June here in Australia, obviously negotiating with South32. But obviously probably caught up with the EPA and other government agencies. Just any thoughts on how things are progressing now with regard to the permitting side? Anything you would want to call out? Or is it all still going well? […] Regarding the approvals, our approvals are continuing on the current path and are progressing well. When I was in Australia, I met with many of the key stakeholders of the process directly. My meetings reaffirmed my confidence in ultimately securing the mining approvals. That said, they also highlighted the number of important steps remaining in the process. As a result, while my confidence in the outcome remains unchanged, the timing could extend beyond our original expectations. You recall that we had said we would have our ministerial approval by the end of the year. If the approvals are delayed beyond that, we have contingency plans in place for various scenarios that would support the operations. We have built in contingency for a six-month delay where there will be no impact on supply and no expected impact on quality or cost. And if it goes beyond that, we have secondary contingency plans where we would consider modifying mining operations and flow rate at the refineries to avoid an ore gap.

p. 9 · Read in context →

San Ciprián's smelter now covers the refinery on EBITDA — the CFO is candid that the complex still burns cash.

Lawson Winder (Analyst, Bank of America Securities); William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer); Molly S. Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer): Congratulations on the ramp in Q2. With respect to the ramp, would you describe it as on schedule for your plans, in particular profitability by year-end 2027? And could you help guide us to where the EBITDA would have been in Q2 2026? […] Let me take it qualitatively, and Molly will give you some numbers. The ramp-up, once we restarted after the power outage last year, was—first of all—safe, and that is most important. Second of all, on time and on budget. So we were very pleased with the ramp-up performance of the San Ciprian smelter. We are also seeing that in today's environment tha is a competitive smelter. Ultimately, we need to have a power supply solution there. As you know, we have power through 2027. I was very pleased with the ramp-up in San Ciprian. […] During the second quarter, the EBITDA of the smelter did fully cover the refinery losses on an EBITDA basis. However, when you look at the whole site, it continues to consume cash with the refinery cash losses as well as the CapEx needed there for the residue storage area. And the smelter has consumed cash for working capital build in connection with the restart. So doing well on EBITDA at least from the complex as a whole, we still have work on cash.

p. 11 · Read in context →

Q1 2026 Earnings Call — Q1 2026

The clearest single explanation of how a Middle East shipping shock propagates through bauxite, alumina and metal — and why Alcoa's contracted energy book insulates the margin. · Open the full transcript →

Why a closed Strait of Hormuz is an aluminum problem: the region imports bauxite, anodes and coke, not just exports metal.

William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Now let us look at the conflict in the Middle East and why it matters to the Alumina segment. The Middle East is the largest alumina importing region in the world, with supply routes for raw materials heavily dependent on the Strait of Hormuz. Each year, roughly 8.8 million tons of alumina and 6 million tons of bauxite transit through the Strait. That changed on February 27. As a result of the conflict, more than 2.5 million tons of annual smelting capacity and nearly 2 million tons of refining capacity are offline year to date. That is a meaningful disruption to the global system. Alumina refineries in the region are integrated with aluminum smelters. However, approximately half the region's bauxite requirements are imported from outside the Middle East. This structure leaves the regional aluminum system particularly exposed to shipping disruptions and logistical constraints. And it does not stop at bauxite and alumina. Several smelters in the region also rely on imported anodes, calcined coke, and coal tar pitch. With transit through the Strait restricted, those materials are harder to move, raising costs and increasing uncertainty. Given the Middle East's important role in global green petroleum coke exports, these disruptions are already rippling through the global calcined coke market. The takeaway is clear: structural dependencies in the Middle East mean that disruption there does not stay local. It moves quickly through the aluminum value chain, tightening supply, increasing cost volatility, and elevating risk well beyond the region itself.

p. 4 · Read in context →

The lag structure that governs refinery costs: caustic five to six months, carbon and freight later still.

Molly S. Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer): On raw materials in general, we do not have concerns at this point on supply. Our procurement and logistics teams have done a great job navigating the challenges of the conflict. We only have a small portion of caustic soda that we were sourcing from the Middle East, and that has already been redirected to alternate supply. On the price side, in addition to that diesel price that we talked about, we do expect to have price increases in the second quarter, but because of inventory lags, those purchase prices will not flow through to the P&L until beyond the second quarter. If you look at caustic, we do expect rising prices with the lower petrochemicals processing that impacts chlorine production, where caustic is a byproduct. Caustic is on a five- to six-month lag. Carbon prices are als rising due to higher green petroleum coke pricing and availability dynamics, so we will have some exposure there, but not within the second quarter. We also have elevated oil prices that are impacting our freight. There is a portion of that that will flow through, but it will be fairly small. A lot of the freight cost goes into inventory; again the lag, so that will be experienced a bit later.

p. 6 · Read in context →

Asked directly whether San Ciprián runs profitably, the CFO says the restarted smelter cannot yet carry the refinery.

Katja Jancic (Analyst, BMO Capital Markets); Molly S. Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer): And on San Ciprián, given that it is now restarted, in the current environment do the operations— both refinery and smelter—run profitably? […] It is embedded in the guide that we have provided. On your point about product mix, yes, that is right—less P1020 and more value-add supports higher premiums. The smelter is doing very well now that it has completed the full restart. Unfortunately, though, we are continuing to have significant losses at the refinery, and within 2026, the smelter will not generate enough cash flow to cover the refinery’s free cash flow losses. We remain on our plan, we are meeting our commitments under the viability agreement, and we are working toward our objective of achieving a neutralization of our cash flows there by 2027. But at current pricing, the refinery remains very challenged.

p. 7 · Read in context →

Substitution economics against copper, steel and PET — and why management equates hitting the net-debt target with maximum firm value.

Timna Tanners (Analyst, Wells Fargo); William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): I wanted to circle back on some comments that Bill made last quarter about substitution of aluminum for copper. Do you have any observations on that dynamic given the change in prices, and anything you are seeing on substitution away from aluminum given the rise in price as well? And on capital allocation, the last couple of months’ dynamics have changed and potentially a bigger amount of free cash flow—any updated thoughts or any timeframe when you might have updated thoughts on allocation of that additional cash or key uses going forward? […] At a high level, with copper pricing where it is, there are still real reasons to substitute into aluminum. Aluminum prices have gone up sharply in this conflict, but we believe there are still good reasons to substitute into aluminum. On the other side, on the margin, we have seen some small substitution out of aluminum into steel for applications that can do that. But the larger automotive applications—because they are multiyear platforms—we have not seen that substitution yet. And when you consider things like packaging, the alternative is PET, and with oil prices at current levels, PET would not look attractive to substitute for aluminum. On capital allocation, I get excited about getting into our target net debt level. Our leverage ratios are low; getting into that range translates to the lowest WACC, and once you have the lowest WACC, you have the highest firm value.

p. 10 · Read in context →

What restarting one idled potline actually costs — $100 million, one to two years, and a power question that outranks the tariff.

Nick Giles (Analyst, B. Riley Securities); William F. Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Can you clarify how you are thinking about Warrick in terms of a restart? What would it take from here for you to move forward, and do you have any rough estimate for the CapEx requirements? […] Warrick—glad you asked. We talked about restarting capacity in Australia, the ramp-up in Brazil, ramping up capacity in Lista, and we just completed the ramp-up at San Ciprián. So you should be asking about those 50 thousand tons at Warrick. First, the condition of the curtailed line at Warrick is pretty poor. It will require about $100 million of capital, and we think it will be one to two years for that restart. There are some long lead time items, specifically around the electrical equipment, required to restart Warrick. On paper, the restart looks positive at this point. However, we are weighing availability of short-term and long-term electricity, and our ability to successfully run that plant at a four-line operation safely.

p. 11 · Read in context →

Q4 and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call — Q4 2025

The policy-economics call: who actually bears the Section 232 tariff, how CBAM nets out for a European producer, and why no one is building greenfield smelters. · Open the full transcript →

CBAM worked through end to end: importers buy certificates, domestic producers pay via ETS, Alcoa nets roughly +$10 per tonne.

William Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Industry analysts estimate that CBAM could add roughly $40 per metric ton to the Rotterdam premium in 2026, and we believe some of this uplift was already included into 2025. While CBAM certificates affect foreign importers, domestic European producers do not purchase CBAM credits and instead experience cost changes through the emissions trading system framework, or ETS, which sets the carbon cost for all domestic producers. Current free allowances under that program will be fully phased out by 2034, pushing carbon costs of domestic producers higher. However, Alcoa's European smelters are advantaged when compared to higher-emitting producers due to their lower Scope 1 direct emissions, driven by modern pot technology and strong operational stability. This makes our cost increase comparatively lower than competitors. Overall, based on our internal analysis, we expect CBAM to generate a net positive impact of approximately $10 per metric ton in 2026, with the uplift in the Rotterdam premium outweighing our carbon cost increases.

p. 5 · Read in context →

How a low-cost producer plays a trough: cut costs, but not so hard that the plants are compromised — and let the cost curve do the work.

Carlos De Alba (Analyst, Morgan Stanley); William Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): My first question is regarding the alumina profitability. Clearly, they are under pressure, maybe at the bottom, depending on how things play out. But the profitability for that business unit or that segment for you guys has come down. Based on the guidance, probably it's going to be breakeven. Give or take. So can you talk about what the plans are to potentially come out with initiatives to reduce cost if possible, improve productivity, efficiencies, and just to enhance the profitability of that segment? […] So I'll address it. And if, Molly, if you want to add anything. Clearly, we understand where we are in the cycle alumina. And we've shown in the past, Carlos, that we can get pretty aggressive around costs. Now what we won't do this time around is really put any of our plants in jeopardy for the future. And we have a low-cost position on the cost curve. And there are other plants around the world, specifically in China, that are much higher on the cost curve. So they will be under pressure. Their margins will be under significant pressure at these levels.

p. 6 · Read in context →

Not land sales: ten priority properties, multi-year payment streams, $500 million to $1 billion targeted.

Molly Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer): The negotiation for the primary site that we're working on now, it's taking longer because it is not a simple land sale. This particular negotiation could involve a multi-year payment stream as well as some value-sharing structures. We're going to take our time and get this right, make sure we get the most value, so that's the slight extension on the timing there. We are continuing to progress several other sites. You know, we have 10 priority sites in total to meet our target of $500 million to $1 billion over the next five years.

p. 6 · Read in context →

The full San Ciprián arithmetic: 2026 losses quantified, and the CO2 compensation timing that gets the complex to cash neutral in 2027.

Katja Jancic (Analyst, BMO Capital Markets); Molly Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer): And then maybe shifting to San Ciprian, given the current alumina and aluminum environment, if the operation would be at full capacity, would the operation generate, would the EBITDA be positive? […] For the smelter, we will reach profitability after we complete the restart, and that is still on track for 2026. The pricing is very favorable there. We are still working on our overall program for the complex, and I can give you an update on our EBITDA guidance for '26 for the combined smelter and refinery. So we have an EBITDA loss of approximately $75 to $100 million, the majority of that is the refinery. Our free cash flow consumption will be approximately $100 to $130 million, and that includes refinery CapEx of about $50 million. […] In Spain, we do not record the CO2 compensation until it is earned, and recall there's a three-year clawback. So we will have cash receipts of about $85 million coming in the '27 for our '26 production. So that's why we still have confidence that by the '27, we will have reached our neutrality goal.

p. 7 · Read in context →

Over $1 billion of gross tariff a year — and the Midwest premium has risen enough to pass all of it to customers.

Glyn Lawcock (Analyst, Barrenjoey); William Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): Okay. That's great. And then maybe just I don't know if you've mentioned it, but just the Canada tariff exemption. I mean, how long is a piece of string, but just any updates on discussions there? Or is it still something too hard to call? […] I think it's very hard to call with all the geopolitical changes that are going on around the world, Glyn. It's difficult to say whether there will be a Canadian exemption. The Midwest premium obviously has risen to cover the total tariff expense. As a company, we're probably spending over $1 billion in gross tariff expense on an annual basis, but the Midwest premium is high enough to cover that. So the tariffs in their entirety are getting passed on to customers at this point.

p. 8 · Read in context →

Just inside the net-debt target, the priority order: stay in range, sustain the assets, then split cash between returns and growth.

Lawson Winder (Analyst, Bank of America); Molly Beerman (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer); William Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): So we did just get under the target at $1.46 billion. So again, as we said in our comments, our goal is not only to stay with to get to the range, but to stay within it throughout our cycles. And as we mentioned, we're going to consume cash in the first quarter that will be related to both working capital and tax payments. We do expect to generate cash across 2026. And that will be used for additional debt repayments. Recall we still have $219 million on our 2028 notes. We will expect to have excess cash to compete between shareholder returns and value-creating growth opportunities. […] If I would just add to that, it all starts with a rock-solid balance sheet. And we are now within our target range. But a fundamental belief on our part is that one of the strengths of our company is that we need to have a fortress balance sheet, and we're within the range. Beyond that, we have the sustaining capital that we'll spend to sustain the cash flow that we get from the operations. And then as Molly said extremely well, it's going to be a mix between returns to shareholders and growth.

p. 9 · Read in context →

Restart versus buy versus build — the CEO says no location on earth offers energy cheap enough to justify a greenfield smelter.

Lachlan Shaw (Analyst, UBS); William Oplinger (President and Chief Executive Officer): My second question, so you just gave a bit of a color there in terms of the existing portfolio and potential optionality to restart? But if I sort of step back look at the aluminum market, roll forward a year or two, trade seems likely to be tightening. When you look at the options around restarting versus buying versus building, I mean, how are you seeing those sorts of trends right now? […] It really depends on what product line that you're looking at. So remember that we have three different product lines, bauxite, alumina, and aluminum. At this point, we do not have greenfield expansion plans for aluminum, and we've not found anywhere around the world that provides a sufficiently low energy price for sufficient returns on a greenfield plant at this point. In the case of refining and bauxite, very similar. Refining capital costs are still fairly high. And certainly at today's prices, it makes it difficult for a greenfield expansion. Now with that said, we do have brownfield opportunities to potentially grow in both mining, refining, and smelting. But at this point, we don't have significant greenfield plans going forward.

p. 10 · Read in context →

Q1 2025 Earnings Call — Q1 2025

The tariff-shock call: the first full accounting of Section 232 on Canadian metal, the structural math of the U.S. aluminum deficit, and the net-debt target that still governs capital allocation. · Open the full transcript →

Where the $1.0–1.5 billion adjusted net debt target comes from — investment-grade metrics held through the whole cycle, not just the peak.

Molly Beerman (CFO): Our overall capital allocation framework remains unchanged. It starts with maintaining a strong balance sheet throughout the cycle, and sufficiently funding our operations to sustain and improve them. The optimal capital structure for our company is reached when investment-grade leverage metrics are achieved reducing our WACC and creating value for our stockholders through a higher company valuation, lower cost of financing, and improved project viability. We want to maintain investment-grade leverage metrics throughout all business cycles not only at the mid or top part of the cycle. Based on this, we first defined a target for adjusted debt which includes pension and OPEB liabilities. This target is $2.1 billion to $2.5 billion. Then considering our historical use rate of cash, we target a cash balance between $1 million and $1.5 million. Netting the cash with the adjusted debt, results in our targeted range of adjusted net debt of $1 billion to $1.5 billion.

p. 2 · Read in context →

The direct hit: 70% of Canadian production goes to U.S. customers, $400–425 million of annual tariff, ~$100 million net after the premium.

William Oplinger (President and CEO): The U.S. Section 232 tariff structure has been in place for some time, in March, the tariff increased from 10% to 25% and the exemption for Canadian metal imported into the U.S. was removed. This is the most material impact on Alcoa, as approximately 70% of our aluminum produced in Canada is destined for U.S. customers. We are now subject to 25% tariff cost, which totals an estimated $400 to $425 million annually. Of course, there is a higher Midwest premium, which offsets some of this cost and certainly benefits our U.S. smelters but currently the net annual result is approximately $100 million negative for our business.

p. 3 · Read in context →

Why the U.S. cannot smelt its way out: restarting every idle pot still leaves a 3.6 million tonne gap.

William Oplinger (President and CEO): In 2024, the U.S. imported approximately 4.2 million metric tons of primary aluminum, with imports of Canadian aluminum representing approximately 70% or 2.9 million metric tons. The four operating smelters in the U.S. produce 700,000 metric tons of aluminum each year. If all idle smelting capacity in the U.S. were to restart, which is approximately 600,000 metric tons, the U.S. would still be short by 3.6 million metric tons. It takes many years to build a new smelter and at least five to six smelters would be required to address the U.S. demand for primary aluminum. These new smelters would require additional energy production equivalent to almost seven new nuclear reactors or more than ten Hoover Dams. Until additional smelting capacity is built in the U.S., the most efficient aluminum suppl chain is Canadian aluminum flowing into the U.S.

p. 3 · Read in context →

The cost-curve read that sets the floor under alumina: with bauxite high and prices low, over 80% of Chinese refineries are underwater.

William Oplinger (President and CEO): With bauxite prices remaining relatively high, and the current lower alumina price, we estimate that over 80% of Chinese refineries are unprofitable. Additionally, a recent announcement by the Chinese government stated that there would be higher scrutiny on new alumina projects regarding air pollution control, off-site sourcing, and red mud processing, which could bring additional constraints on growth in Chinese alumina production and may accelerate curtailment. This is a dynamic market and Alcoa's global network of refineries provides security and supply of alumina both to Alcoa smelters and our major customers, which are primarily in the milling.

p. 4 · Read in context →

The San Ciprián funding envelope made explicit: $70–90 million of EBITDA loss, $90–110 million of cash, with hedges bounding the downside.

Chris LaFemina (Analyst, Jefferies); Molly Beerman (CFO); William Oplinger (President and CEO): So if we're looking at, I don't know, $100 million to $120 million of negative cash flow from the restart of the smelter in 2025, what happens beyond 2025? How do the hedges help? And then secondly, I think there was, you know, the guidance had been that if you burn through roughly $200 million at San Ciprian comes to a point where you just can't continue to subsidize this? And does this hedging strategy that you refer to here protect you from that over the 2025 to 2027 period? […] Fortunately, we did start to put the hedges in place several weeks ago, and we have secured hedge pricing that will help us to manage the cost within the funding envelope. We are focused year by year on 2025. We released the guidance for the smelter. We expect to lose about $70 million to $90 million in EBITDA. The cash used by those operations will be about $90 million to $110 million. The CapEx that we referred to is already included in our CapEx guidance.

p. 6 · Read in context →

Q2 2024 Earnings Call — Q2 2024

The call on the eve of the Alumina Limited acquisition, with San Ciprián weeks from running out of cash and the $645 million self-help program mid-flight. · Open the full transcript →

The vote that consolidated AWAC: Alumina Limited approved by Alcoa holders, close set for August 1.

William Oplinger (CEO): Before we get to all the good work we have done in the quarter, I'm pleased to say that we are nearing completion of the Alumina Limited acquisition. We held the Alcoa Stockholder Meeting yesterday and Alcoa stockholders have voted overwhelmingly to approve issuing Alcoa shares for the transaction. The Alumina Limited Shareholder meeting occurs in a few hours and we expect a favorable result there as well, which would lead to an expected transaction closing date of August 1. As you've heard me say before, we believe that this transaction is the right deal for both sets of shareholders and we look forward to realizing its benefits and welcoming Alumina Limited shareholders into Alcoa.

p. 1 · Read in context →

A concrete piece of unit economics: buying four ships to cut $14–16 per tonne of alumina out of Brazilian bauxite freight.

Molly Beerman (CFO): The first half of 2024 capital expenditures include an investment of $38 million, which is a portion of our commitment to purchase two vessels to provide bauxite transportation in Brazil. Two additional vessels will be leased. We have an opportunity for significant reductions in bauxite freight cost between our Juruti mine and Alumar refinery. We estimate savings to be $14 to $16 per tonne of alumina. The first vessel arrived in Brazil this week with an additional three ships to be received later this year. We hired a contract operator with considerable expertise in the region to manage the technical operations on our behalf.

p. 1 · Read in context →

What low-carbon actually means in this industry, and why the scarcity of low-carbon refinery projects is the durable part of the story.

William Oplinger (CEO): For primary aluminum to be truly lowcarbon, it needs to be low-carbon from mine to metal. We offer our low-carbon EcoLum Primary Aluminum, which is produced with less than 4 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents per ton of aluminum produced, including Scope 1 and 2 emissions from mining, refining, smelting, and casting. And the world's only low-carbon alumina brand, EcoSource, which has a carbon footprint under 0.6 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of alumina, including Scope 1 and 2 emissions from mining and refining. However, when considering likely alumina refinery projects, there are very few low-carbon alumina projects in the global pipeline and none that we expect to come online before 2030.

p. 3 · Read in context →

How an alumina deficit clears: either smelters curtail or refineries ramp — there is no third path.

Michael Dudas (Analyst, Vertical Research); William Oplinger (CEO): Bill, maybe you can share your thoughts on the alumina market. And obviously with all the dynamics that's occurring, how does this environment compare to other environments you've witnessed with spiking and capacity issues? Is this something that has a little bit more sustainability? […] So the alumina industry today is in a fairly unique situation. We exited the second quarter in a deficit to the tune of around globally for the industry, about a 3 million metric ton deficit. For the full year, we're anticipating that alumina will be in deficit. So it's a situation that is very tight and we're seeing it around the world. The only way that deficit gets solved obviously is if either smelters curtail or we get ramp-ups in alumina; there's really two things that drove that deficit in the near-term. One was supply issues from some of our competitors, specifically in Northern Australia and in China. So as we look forward, that market only comes back into balance if those supply issues are solved.

p. 6 · Read in context →

Inside the $645 million improvement program: raw-material lags, hundreds of tracked initiatives, and 6% cut from every budget.

Molly Beerman (CFO): So on the improvement programs, a couple more points on the raw materials. There aren't necessarily additional actions that we have to take. We are negotiating now on the purchase prices that we're seeing now are going to deliver the year-over-year improvement. Recall, we're on those lags in inventory. So the six months in caustic and the three months on coke and pitch, so good line of sight to realize that with the contracts that we have in place now. As far as the productivity and competitiveness program, we have already identified lists of hundreds of initiatives. They are being executed now. Internally, we're tracking that against revised budgets. Everyone across the company, all the budget managers have lost about 6% of their budgets. So they are adhering to those. And so that's how we're monitoring the $100 million program there.

p. 11 · Read in context →

More calls

Q3 2025 Earnings Call — Q3 2025 · 13 pages · Go here for the energy bar management actually uses — $30–40 per megawatt hour for a smelter versus data centers paying $100 — plus the Massena ten-year power contract, the permanent closure of Kwinana, the Ma'aden stake sale and the three-government gallium project. · Open →

Q2 2025 Earnings Call — Q2 2025 · 11 pages · The quarter Section 232 doubled to 50% and the Ma'aden joint-venture sale closed; useful for how the Midwest premium responded as the tariff rate stepped up. · Open →

Q4 and Full Year 2024 Earnings Call — Q4 2024 · 14 pages · The full-year recap of the turnaround year — Alumina Limited integrated, Kwinana curtailed, nine of eleven smelters up — set against record alumina prices. · Open →

Q3 2024 Earnings Call — Q3 2024 · 14 pages · The first quarter reported with 100% of AWAC consolidated, during the 2024 alumina price spike — the cleanest look at what full ownership does to segment economics. · Open →

Q1 2024 Earnings Call — Q1 2024 · 14 pages · Where the Alumina Limited deal terms were first laid out — the 0.02854 exchange ratio, the ~$2.2 billion implied equity value, and why the AWAC minority structure was worth collapsing. · Open →

Q4 and Full Year 2023 Earnings Call — Q4 2023 · 30 pages · The trough call: full-year return on equity of negative 8.9%, the decision to curtail the 60-year-old Kwinana refinery, a revolver covenant amendment, and analysts pressing on whether the dividend was safe. · Open →

Q3 2023 Earnings Call — Q3 2023 · 31 pages · Oplinger's first call as CEO, laying out the initial diagnosis of the portfolio's underperforming assets before the 2024 restructuring actions were taken. · Open →

Q2 2022 Earnings Call — Q2 2022 · 31 pages · The top of the cycle for contrast — $913 million of quarterly EBITDA, $275 million of buybacks and a fresh $500 million authorization, just before European energy costs broke the model. · Open →